Engineering Perspective: How to Correctly Calculate the Actual Load Capacity of Caster Wheels
Why catalog load ratings often differ from real-world performance
When selecting caster wheels, load capacity is almost always the first specification discussed.
However, from an engineering standpoint, it is also one of the most misunderstood and frequently misused figures.
Many carts and equipment meet the stated load rating on paper,
yet fail prematurely, deform, or create safety risks in real use.
In most cases, the issue is not product quality —
The calculation logic itself is flawed from the beginning.
1. A Critical Starting Point: Catalog Load Ratings Are Static Values
Most caster wheel load ratings listed in catalogs refer to:
Static load rating (static breaking load)
This value represents:
-
A non-moving condition
-
Uniform load distribution
-
The maximum weight a wheel can withstand before permanent deformation or failure begins
What it does not represent:
-
Continuous rolling
-
Starting and stopping
-
Turning and side loading
-
Uneven floor conditions
Yet, many selections rely entirely on this number.
2. What Engineers Actually Care About: Dynamic Working Load
In real applications, caster wheels experience:
-
Impact forces during start-up
-
Uneven loading during turning
-
Load concentration caused by floor irregularities
-
Additional forces from operator input
Therefore, the correct engineering question is:
Can this caster sustain the load reliably during long-term movement and operation?
This is known as the dynamic working load, which is always significantly lower than the static rating.
3. Why “Total Weight ÷ Number of Wheels” Is Incorrect
This is one of the most common mistakes in caster selection.
In an ideal scenario:
-
Perfectly flat floor
-
Rigid frame
-
No movement or turning
Load distribution might be close to equal.
In reality:
-
Floors are uneven
-
Carts turn, stop, and restart
-
One or two wheels often carry significantly more than the average load
This is why engineers never rely on simple division when calculating real load conditions.
4. Practical Engineering Approach to Load Calculation (Simplified)
Below is a commonly used and conservative engineering method.
Step 1｜Determine the Total System Weight
Include:
-
Equipment weight
-
Maximum payload
-
All additional accessories
Step 2｜Assume the Worst-Case Load Distribution
Instead of ideal conditions.
Common conservative assumptions:
-
Only 3 wheels carry the load (for 4-wheel carts)
-
Or one wheel may experience 40–50% of the total weight
Step 3｜Apply a Safety Factor
Typical recommendations:
-
Low frequency, smooth operation: 1.5×
-
Industrial or frequent movement: 2.0× or higher
Step 4｜Select Casters Based on Dynamic Capacity
Ensure the selected caster:
-
Operates below its long-term working load
-
Not near its maximum static limit
This is how engineers design systems that last, not just survive initial use.
5. Why Engineers Intentionally “Underuse” Load Ratings
A common question from non-engineering teams is:
“If the catalog says 500 kg, why do you only recommend using 200–250 kg?”
The reason is simple:
-
Engineering focuses on long-term stability and safety
-
Not on surviving maximum stress conditions
In European markets, this conservative approach is widely recognized as a sign of professional and responsible design.
6. The Real Value of Correct Load Calculation
Proper load calculation delivers benefits far beyond safety:
-
Significantly longer caster lifespan
-
Lower starting resistance and smoother movement
-
Reduced operator fatigue
-
Fewer complaints, failures, and downtime
These advantages are invisible on a datasheet, but critical in real operations.
Conclusion: Engineering Is About Long-Term Usability, Not Maximum Numbers
For engineers, calculating caster load capacity is not a mathematical exercise —
It is a process of risk management and real-world usage evaluation.
When selection decisions are based on how equipment is actually used,
casters become a reliable component rather than a hidden failure point.